Support | News | Classic | F.A.Q. | Discord | Discussions | Wiki | Roadmap

CursedPh4nt0m Railguns shouldn't have any accelerators, if a railgun has an accelerator it should be backwards, there could be railgun loaders placed randomly around the ship, missile launchers should be placed inside the ship, needs more corridors and backwards conveyor belts, weapons aren't blocking each other, the ship can still move, it should have thrusters on only one side, should have fire extinguishers with no doors... umm I think that's enough for now.

You have a ways to go if you want to beat what people on multiplayer come up with. That can still actually fight.

CursedPh4nt0m It must be incredibly fast with this much engine rooms! 😉

Equalizer Seems like braindead mode wasn't enough.... Gotta make my little brother build a ship then!
It already has all thrusters on the same side and I decided to use no fe to begin with, as the guide says otherwise. You're right tho, this thing still has some firepower even altho it's certainly not supposed to.
I'm actually somewhat scared to ask, but could you post an example for that last line of your reply?

    • Edited

    CursedPh4nt0m
    How about maximum length rails with ammo factories, stacked one corridor apart for the width of the build grid, with a line of reactors on the back? Somewhere in there is a single cockpit and some crew of course, maybe some thrusters too.

    "Star Destroyers" with maybe 8 lasers per side, lines and clumps of reactors and engine rooms in the middle of the ship, and only forward thrusters are extremely common.

    Ragnarok lookalikes are also a thing, though that's not what they're usually called.

      Guy I actually got something similar to the first two things somewhere in my ship folder. Would've never done the third thing, as I just can't build more than three blocks without mirror mode...

      [Personal note: Add "The Builders Crime" V2 here.]

      • Edited

      CursedPh4nt0m
      Can you do worse than THIS?

      image https://i.imgur.com/wDehQ9w.png

      (You might want to load it in Cosmoteer to see it's epic name!)

        Alpha It's still too "good". You'd have to ensure it can't move properly, remove the shields doors, add more usless stuff and make it way more deformed. (And please never mention that one certain thing ever again! I took part at that stupidity and I still wake up screaming at this guy...)

        CursedPh4nt0m I will, hehe.

          Alpha Just to make sure: Don't you fricking dare mentioning this ever goddamn again!

          CursedPh4nt0m man that thread needs some necromancy >😃

          • Edited

          CursedPh4nt0m
          image https://i.imgur.com/IaDYVv9.png

          Don't worry, I wouldn't dare to mention it again, I've found a better name.

          By the way, smileys on the explosive charges look really evil...

          image https://i.imgur.com/dqqSVb0.png

          bluurgh It's the unnatural flickering of the smiley nose...

            Alpha it pulls the eyes together in an evil way

            also i just love these hihi

            image https://i.imgur.com/Rk2MVfr.jpg


            CursedPh4nt0m
            When you're bad enough, making a Ragnarok with symmetry on is actually possible.

            Creative mode procedural ships are pretty bad

            Who can autogen better ?
            image https://i.imgur.com/eIdCxUm.jpg

            bluurgh If procedural generation would be fantastic, there would be no need for the built-in ships. It would make a lot of stuff obsolete actually.

              image https://i.imgur.com/tDVA6TU.png
              the cactus uses advanced armour that also produces power. Very efficient, Right?

              StarTrek I'm way to tempted to announce you winner simply for (not) trying...
              Lacks engines tho.

              CursedPh4nt0m the blue ball in the centre is an engine it uses mods