MY PLANS FOR THE FUTURE OF COSMOTEER

Walt

ResExsention Also, are roof turrets planned? I know you have the capital cannon on the Trello (and perhaps a laser counterpart) which were said to be 4x4 roof turrets, but is there anything else?

Nothing specific, but that doesn't mean I won't, only that I haven't thought about it much.

---Y2K---

sick

Node114

dang good thing i did not use my steam gift card

hatty

Walt If there is a Linux port in the steam version then you can pretty much guarantee me buying it.

Jhaerik

Walt God I hope not. Mining/trading is sooooooo boring.

Altraxia

Jhaerik Maybe if everything costs 10K each,mining might not be so boring

ResExsention

Jhaerik I guess another way to offset this grinding would be to make the already planned pirate attacks and stuff a bit more frequent when mining -- this way you've got to pay attention.

tarrith

Hey Walt.
I think what is really dragging large ship battles down performance wise is how the game tracks so many crew. running around. When not in build mode you can still see them all scurrying around. That has got to be taking up some serious GPU/CPU cycles. A couple of nice large ships and the game literally grinds to a halt. And I have to say I've got a pretty powerful machine. Maybe have it so the crew visuals can be turned off.
I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one that likes large ship battles, but disappointed that the game can't handle it.
I'm also hoping that less mod breaking happens, I'm not a mod maker, but it's got to be rather annoying to mod makers who take the time to create a mod only for it to break in the next release :\
Other than that, can't wait for the full release.
Keep up the good work 🙂

Walt

tarrith A couple of nice large ships and the game literally grinds to a halt.

How large and how many? Also, what version of the game agree your playing? The latest couple versions had large performance improvements. My laptop (which is pretty nice but not a gaming laptop) can run a 4v4 Terror battle at about 30fps.

tarrith Maybe have it so the crew visuals can be turned off.

I guarantee you that crew graphics are not the problem. A simple way to confirm is to pause the game. If your fps improves a lot, then it's the game simulation that's the bottleneck, not the graphics.

Raufbold

tarrith Yeah - mod breaking has been the biggest issue actually. Mods take care of almost anything in this game that's not already there - roof turrets, firing distances, etc. But most of them break every so often and fixing them is really a pain,
Other than that, I would probably vouch for fighter/small craft hangars and some variety of control rooms with them being actually required (i.e. so that there would be a reason to go with a large control room vs small one). Other stuff we have mods for, really.

tarrith

Walt
Pretty large, My version of the SB Yamato against USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D
Gets down to about 10fps. But your right, hit the pause and it jacks back up to 60fps.
Hmmm. Maybe i need to lay off the missiles.
But...but...but missiles!
Nope just disabled the missiles, down to 7.9 unpaused.

tarrith

Disclaimer - Apologies to whoever created the Enterprise D, I couldn't find the author (I did look) but the ships darn cool 😃

PS. I use Warhammer 4oK 7 ABH Faction Mod 🙂

Ultranova

tarrith Mods will slow your game down more than vanilla, simply because there's a lot more going on. Especially ABH, which uses many experimental features that haven't been fully optimised or don't entirely work too well, meaning that the game has to work harder and therefore your computer won't be able to run larger ships without struggling a bit.

tarrith

Ultranova Pity, because those two mods are fantastic fun. it would be nice to be able just right click on "parts" and delete them or move manage them into personal catagories.

Northerner

Can i just say how HOT the new sprites are?

dafeeeeeeeeeesh

Northerner
Ooooooh i see you are interested in armor block chan.

Crimson_Reaper

Major concern with the new paid version continues to be with the extension of dead zones particularly with regards to thrusters/engines and shields. I'd like to buy the new paid version and explore the new single player mode(which I'm really hoping to see carrier features such as fighters that are perhaps custom built) but I'd like to bring in most of my older ships from what would be the free classic version of cosmoteer of which many use internal engine systems and compact shielding. I'd very like if these parts in particular could be considered against the extension of dead zones. Perhaps something along the lines of re-extending the dead zone for Ions or perhaps introducing different classes of engines of which a type for internal usage and another type with longer deadzones but increased speed over the former internal use engines could be considered? Regardless I'll likely try to go ahead and buy the steam version to support the game, just a bit concerned with the transfer of most older ship designs to the new cosmoteer.

Walt

Crimson_Reaper I need to balance what's best for the game long-term against keeping old ships compatible. I think that the paid release is probably the best time to introduce breaking changes, and I think these changes need to be made. My current plan is to include a mod which reverts the deadzone changes so that players who want to keep playing with their old ships can do that.

DraconisTheWyvern

Walt aw okay, that answers that.

DraconisTheWyvern

Walt sounds good, I will have to wait a bit to get it but its alright. would we be able to import old ships into the paid for version?