Alpha yes because if its a planck length wide it will still be small
dafeeeeeeeeeesh Alright, I think it's better to stop here, we're going off-topic. 😃
dafeeeeeeeeeesh
Alpha
The correct answer here is to measure volume. If the wire is .001 cm wide, the volume is 1e+102 cm3
Big.
Alpha yeah but i have an example for you its like comparing the executor star destroyer to the eclipse star destroyer the executor star destroyer is longer but the eclipse is still bigger
Alpha Well, this wide desktop screen can't show it either.
mystique boi thats not planck length small and thats what i was saying
mystique Thank you, someone who understands the size of a googol kilometers! 😄
Alpha i do its a large length bigger than the known universe but if its a googol kilometers long but no width it will still be small an infinitely long first dimensional object it is just a small 2d object
dafeeeeeeeeeesh That's true, if the width is 0, than it will occupy a volume of 0. Unless the length is infinite, which will make the whole equation weird.
Alpha and thats why i called the thing smol its volume is very low compared to most super dreadnoughts
Alpha Well, 0 * ∞ = 0
No infinities is... nothing.
Alpha Think about it. If a wire has no thickness, then even if it's infinitely long, then it has no volume.
mystique Perhaps... I have been in an interesting discussion about this. It all depends on how infinity and zero are defined.
mystique Well, 0 * ∞ = 0
thats were it gets tricky because Infinity can never change it always stays Infinity and if it doesint it always cant be calculated for instince infinity minus infinity = an undetermined number even though any number minus itself = zero so its hard to judge if thats true or not
mystique
CrazyBirdie
CursedPh4nt0m
The real issue is that infinite is undefined, making the answer of the equation ∞x0 also undefined. Unless we use fancy workarounds with limits (only possible in some cases), we cannot answer the any question containing this.
CrazyBirdie i agree because if you take infinity as every number it = zero but if you take it as Aleph null its infinite and theirs many more for infinity and zero
dafeeeeeeeeeesh But '∞-1 (theoretically)< ∞ (theoretically)< 2∞', soo... Also '0x=0' even if 'x = ∞', resulting in '0∞=0'.
Alpha Despite beeing undefined, the (theoretical) value of '∞' should be the same in any equation, making '2∞' comparably larger than '∞-1'.
∞-1=∞ and 2∞=∞ (theoretically doesn't work here)
CrazyBirdie That works because infinite is infinite. It's the nature of infinity. 😄
W E I R D O S
EpicJp21 #nerdhater
