Kirikari Design Specifications

yobeefjerky

Hello, i am delphi, you have accessed the kirikari blueprint terminal, here i will give you the blueprints to the kirikari cruiser

image https://i.imgur.com/b0pu2pz.jpg
Cost: 788,550 Credits
Crew Complement: 128 Crew
Operational length: up to 2 years with no refueling
Engine specifications: Quad core vacuum thruster, 2x Inertial Repulsion Drives
Drive Specs: Dual core assembly drive, Type 5-2
Drive speed: 5k C Cruising speed, 10k C Top speed
Weight: 2,969.0 Metric Tonnes
Armor : 5 meters thick, Separated Plating, Viudin Plating

Description:
These vessels are the literal definition of the word "overkill" with 52 Ion-Fusion Turrets, and 150 Lighter fusion turrets, not even getting into the antimatter lances this ship is most likely able to rip apart an imperial star destroyer in all out combat, the ion-fusion turrets easily ripping apart shielding, this also has its own unintended side effect, earthguard does not use shields, so its ships are designed to take serious punishment.

Other things
2 Docking bays for shuttles
2 Cargo bays (Can carry 500 tons each)
12 type 2 Fabricators (Can fabricate food, tools, and basic materials)
5 type 4 Fabricators (Can fabricate fuel, hull plating, armor, and advanced materials)
150 Escape pods (30 day operational lifespan for 5 humans)
5 Oversized fusion reactors (Full output of 1,000 Terawatts)
52 Ion-Fusion Turrets (Each weapon has an output of 1 Gigaton)
150 Fusion Turrets (Each weapon has an output of 25 Megatons)
10 Slipspace negotiator shields
5 Exotic matter tanks (50 pounds of E.M.)
10 Backup fuel tanks (250 Gallons of fuel)
20 Main fuel tanks (500 Gallons of fuel)
5 Antimatter tanks (1 ton of AM)
1 Particle Accelerator (1 Gram per hour)
1 Antimatter nuker (Minimum output of 1 Teraton, Max output of 100 Teratons)
2 Spinal antimatter lances (Minimum output of 50 Gigatons, max output of 100 Gigatons)
2 Wing mounted Lances (Minimum output of 25 Gigatons, max output of 50 Gigatons)
20 10 Gigaton Fusion Torpedoes (Active)
50 10 Gigaton Fusion Torpedoes (Inactive)
1,000 150 Megaton Fusion missiles (Active)
25,000 150 Megaton Fusion missiles (Inactive)

yobeefjerky

image https://i.imgur.com/LydJzt0.png
Proof that the kirikari is superior to the ISD

Lafiel

"overkill" isn't a negative notion for a warship. 😃

yobeefjerky

Actually though they could most likely rip the death star apart if they really wanted to, 100 Teratons is probably enough to destroy the surface of the moon

Lafiel

Uhm, heavy cruiser is a warship type classification not to mention having offensive weapons is the primary criteria for combatant. That's why hospital ships are not allowed to be armed.

Well, even without calculating I can tell with 100% certainty such meager firepower is by far not enough to vaporize the Moon. Even if I tried to do so NASA has been tight lipped on moon rock data not to mention NASA has been altering (censorship + miss-information) all their documents since Obama (sometime in March 2013/4 don't remember which year). A reason why some nations are racing to the moon now.
But if you insist here's a dirty estimate without going through all 4 transition phases: more than 3500 ExaTons TNT

image https://i.imgur.com/0qTpNfg.png

Power up weapons as a gesture of greetings!

Famous last words of an unknown Minbari captain. 😃

Attention big, mean, hostile alien vessel hovering overhead in an obvious attack posture

spathi reply... 😃

Obellion

Lafiel
And here's the great difference between tactical building and artistic building.
BANG
This greatly shows how can you build a cost efficent, smaller but much more powerful ship.
As is see you didn't put the Forged in Fire into BountybrainAI mode.
In that case it might've emerged victorious xD

Lafiel

I had to use the Forged in Fire since there wasn't a suitable ship at hand. It was in BountybrainAI mode (see the thruster flames). It's just the Forged in Fire was too much damaged to make a difference from that point. I used the prototype for the Cuora class guardship which imho isn't so bad artistically. It just got banged up in the fight.

image https://i.imgur.com/xjtMIBl.png
image https://i.imgur.com/BhA7BEq.png

Obellion

But as i know the BBAI, the moment a ship's side has less combat value(Less turrets than the other side), it will turn around so it can inflict maximum damage. I don't really remember testing the ship in BountybrainAI. So i don't really know how should it act, but i think it SHOULD turn around on it's less damaged side.

Lafiel

Correct, however, the smaller ship was far more agile, hence, the heavy one could never turn fast enough. It would just take longer imho. And besides this was before the diagonal fix so I had to micromanage maneuvering orientation which is admittedly advantageous.

Lafiel

Here are your 3D ships :
Kikirkari
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=252334287

Preator
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=262102727

Terrant Transport
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=360629625

They need adjustments but should do regardless.

Obellion

Lafiel
Oh i love Space Engineers!
Too bad my computer is too weak to run it though. :/

yobeefjerky

same here, love the game, i own it, comp sucks so bad it dies when i play it

Lafiel

I can run it at lowest setting but big ships are lagging non-the-less. And they plan to release more detailed parts soon (about 4x more). What are they thinking! Fine details should be made for small things like buttons but the rest is fine as long as its different from other parts. It's getting more difficult for modders. People are already scarred of mods and designs based on them.

elementking

is this ship downloadable?

elementking

i mean is there a 2-d version for the game

yobeefjerky

elementking Yeah its included in the community ships mod
here is the .png though (not updated to 12.12 so you will have to add point defenses on your own)

image https://i.imgur.com/JJhAUwS.png

Jesus3747

yobeefjerky Beautiful!

elementking

thank you
-w-