Support | News | Classic | F.A.Q. | Discord | Discussions | Wiki | Roadmap


Union Nuke Destroyer N2/Class 2

Union Defence Turret

Union Fighter

Union Nuke DestroyerShip N1/Class 1

Union MotherDestroyerShip

Union BattleDestroyer

DayBreaker why do you take existing classes and slap “battle” or “ship” onto them?

    DayBreaker
    you do know that ship classes exist for a reason, and diffrent casses have diffrent roles, you can just say Destryoyer____ and expect it make make sense,
    There is no such things as a BattleDestroyer there is no such things as a MotherDestroyerShip and no such thing as a Nuke Destoyer
    if your going to make ships and give them classes, you actual real classes that make scenes

      Jared
      @Franco_Aung

      To add on to what Jar said:

      1. Only certain ships have the word "Battle" in their name.
      2. Ships can have custom names, Like the Iowa Class isn't a whole new class of ship, but rather just a variant of a battleship. However, custom ship classes aren't real classes. Like a Fighter-cruiser makes no sense.
      3. Motherships aren't really a "ship" class (as in they can't be designated under something like a battleship), as the term is of itself a class. As for example: A Horton Mothership (its a made up thing, not IRL) wouldn't be called a Horton Mothership Destroyer, but rather simply a Horton-Class Mothership
      4. A NUKE ship (whether it be destroyer, carrier, etc.) Is not a ship class. If it was NUCLEAR-POWERED destroyer (Or rather, just "Destroyer" with a description of a nuclear armaments) then it would be ok.

      BattleCruiserCommander battle carriers are a mix between battleships and carriers

      BattleCruiserCommander I only know one example myself :Secutor Class Battlecarrier

        Fixed the issue.

          so...lore-wise Union Malaysia is actually a single-planet nation? Or even not the entire planet (like Malaysia 😀 ?). Just judging by a complete lack of FTL drives on the ships....

            Raufbold most RP ships dont have FTL as theres no point

              Jared ...which I find rather disappointing, precisely because they are RP. If those were just random designs or MP ships, there would at least be a reason not to have FTL.

              Raufbold
              ..... but is for RP there strictly for looks, you could honestly get by just with armor blocks in the shape of a ship...

                Jared Unless you are me. Then i'm the exception.

                Raufbold RP ships are purely design based, it isn't supposed to work (unless you're that guy above me) since there would be no point.

                  Write a Reply...